We respond to Dikpati et al.'s criticism of our recent solar dynamo model. A different treatment of the magnetic buoyancy is the most probable reason for their different results
International audienceIn a recent paper, Edvardsson et al. (\cite{edvardsson}) propose a new solutio...
A Comment on the Letter by G.G. Howes, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-9007 100, 065004 (2008)10.1103/Phy...
In a recent publication, viz. [Phys. Lett. A 326 (2004) 267], Jovanovic and Shukla (J. and S. in the...
We respond to Dikpati et al.'s criticism of our recent solar dynamo model. A different treatment of ...
We respond to Dikpati et al.'s (2005) criticism of our recent solar dynamo model (Chatterjee et al. ...
Using two distinct simulation codes that respectively apply semi-implicit and fully explicit scheme...
Nataf (Solar Phys. 297, 107, 2022) has recently asserted that the hypothesis that the solar dynamo m...
Abstract The paper by Popova et al. presents an oversimplified mathematical model of solar activity...
In their preceding comment on our paper [Matthaeus et al., 1994] (hereinafter reffered to as paper 1...
We strongly disagree with the essence of the Osherovich (hereafter Osherovich) comment on one of our...
In this response, we address the three main comments by Tsurutani et al. (2018, http://doi.org/10.10...
We show that the upper bound for the central magnetic field of a super-Chandrasekhar white dwarf cal...
International audienceAmong the 18 supposed slow mode transition (SMT) cases identified by [1990, 19...
International audienceRokityansky et al. in their comment on Pham et al. presented an evaluation of ...
Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 175003 (2006) [4 pages] Heating of the Solar Corona by Dissipative Alfvén Solit...
International audienceIn a recent paper, Edvardsson et al. (\cite{edvardsson}) propose a new solutio...
A Comment on the Letter by G.G. Howes, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-9007 100, 065004 (2008)10.1103/Phy...
In a recent publication, viz. [Phys. Lett. A 326 (2004) 267], Jovanovic and Shukla (J. and S. in the...
We respond to Dikpati et al.'s criticism of our recent solar dynamo model. A different treatment of ...
We respond to Dikpati et al.'s (2005) criticism of our recent solar dynamo model (Chatterjee et al. ...
Using two distinct simulation codes that respectively apply semi-implicit and fully explicit scheme...
Nataf (Solar Phys. 297, 107, 2022) has recently asserted that the hypothesis that the solar dynamo m...
Abstract The paper by Popova et al. presents an oversimplified mathematical model of solar activity...
In their preceding comment on our paper [Matthaeus et al., 1994] (hereinafter reffered to as paper 1...
We strongly disagree with the essence of the Osherovich (hereafter Osherovich) comment on one of our...
In this response, we address the three main comments by Tsurutani et al. (2018, http://doi.org/10.10...
We show that the upper bound for the central magnetic field of a super-Chandrasekhar white dwarf cal...
International audienceAmong the 18 supposed slow mode transition (SMT) cases identified by [1990, 19...
International audienceRokityansky et al. in their comment on Pham et al. presented an evaluation of ...
Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 175003 (2006) [4 pages] Heating of the Solar Corona by Dissipative Alfvén Solit...
International audienceIn a recent paper, Edvardsson et al. (\cite{edvardsson}) propose a new solutio...
A Comment on the Letter by G.G. Howes, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-9007 100, 065004 (2008)10.1103/Phy...
In a recent publication, viz. [Phys. Lett. A 326 (2004) 267], Jovanovic and Shukla (J. and S. in the...
DOI
Add to ORKG